Visit Dennis P. McCann's column >>

DENNIS P. MCCANNHome Page

Türkiye'deki Amerikalı Sanatçı
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 70; Links Seeded: 1290
Member Since: 3/2006

Ann Coulter on CNBC Show: Jews Need 'Perfecting'

advertisement

NEW YORK Appearing on Donny Deutsch's CNBC show, "The Big Idea," on Monday night, columnist/author Ann Coulter suggested that the U.S. would be a better place if there weren't any Jewish people and that they had "perfected" themselves into -- Christians.

It led Deutsch to suggest that surely he couldn't mean that, and when she insisted she did, he said this sounded "anti-Semitic."

Asked by Deutsch regarding whether she wanted to be like "the head of Iran" and "wipe Israel off the Earth," Coulter stated: "No, we just want Jews to be perfected, as they say. ... That's what Christianity is. We believe the Old Testament."

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
151
93
31
9.7

Jump to discussion page: 1 2
{"commentId":1091187,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

Coulter isn't even trying to appear sane any more.

{"commentId":1091187,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 28 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:06 PM EDT
{"commentId":1091331,"authorDomain":"Catch22"}

Coulter thrives on controversy. She thrives on hate and polarization.

Actually her position is perfectly "sane" if you believe that Christianity is the one true religion and that everyone else will end up in eternal damnation. I dont know what her actual beliefs are, but this is the belief of many Americans including the many of the people that she sells books to an appeals to.

Ann Coulter thrives on a Manichean black and white, us vs. them, view of the world where those that disagree are stupid lying traitors. She consistently sends that simplistic childish message in politics so its her total lack of nuance is hardly surprising. People like her are right and those who are not are wrong and people who want to hear that over and over again buy her books and support her in her wealthy lifestyle.

{"commentId":1091331,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"Catch22"}
  • 21 votes
#1.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:48 PM EDT
{"commentId":1091463,"authorDomain":"jdoyle"}

She has all the charm of an impacted bowel.

{"commentId":1091463,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"jdoyle"}
  • 32 votes
#1.2 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:25 PM EDT
{"commentId":1091760,"authorDomain":"pobox522rlyeh"}

I can't believe these shows are still having her. I'm not that interested in watching shows that take her as a guest any more, I'm tired of it.

That's not something I say easily. I support free speech, but a show should at least try to maintain it's reputation. When mahmoud ahmadinejad spoke in the US I was actually in favor of it. He's a head of state and what he says is relevant, even if it's frequently disgusting. If he'd spoke in my area, I would have gone, because I would have liked to have studied him.

But to me Coulter has come to represent the lunatic fringe, she's so out there it's just too much. There isn't anything new about what she says, it's just extreme far-right neoconservatism which we once kept in a cold dark place, now brought out into the light.

{"commentId":1091760,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"pobox522rlyeh"}
  • 15 votes
#1.3 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:50 PM EDT
{"commentId":1092952,"authorDomain":"laughman"}

She has all the charm of an impacted bowel.

ROTFL :)

{"commentId":1092952,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"laughman"}
  • 3 votes
#1.4 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:27 AM EDT
{"commentId":1093325,"authorDomain":"ISPY"}

Link @ Laughman and Epiphany Goulash

{"commentId":1093325,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"ISPY"}
    #1.5 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:10 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1093384,"authorDomain":"200MilesUp"}

    Serves the idiot Donny Deutsch right for interviewing her in the first place.

    {"commentId":1093384,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"200MilesUp"}
    • 4 votes
    #1.6 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:28 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1094178,"authorDomain":"JoulesBeef"}

    Coulter thrives on controversy. She thrives on hate and polarization.

    Actually her position is perfectly "sane" if you believe that Christianity is the one true religion and that everyone else will end up in eternal damnation.

    true enough, but she is the conservative pitbull, and she just attacked the neighbors.
    Sure it is controversy and we all knwo she is the queen, but this just help the libs she likes to rile and actually it is likely that she has offended some conservatives. To me this proves she isnt wise. Being a shock jock is nothign new. I could easily make posts here to inflame. But i would be smart enough not to attack even a minority of my supporters.

    {"commentId":1094178,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"JoulesBeef"}
    • 2 votes
    #1.7 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:46 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1094714,"authorDomain":"lycan"}

    Hey, I knew she had a couple of screws in her head loose when she said "Canada should be thankfull that we dont roll over in our sleep and stomp them" or something to that effect.

    I wonder why people listen to her in the first place, but then Again, Oriely has a very popular show as well. So, go figure.

    {"commentId":1094714,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"lycan"}
    • 3 votes
    #1.8 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 4:51 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1094751,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

    While no fan of Coulter or O'Reilly I have the same feelings about Olbermann.

    {"commentId":1094751,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.9 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:01 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1094754,"authorDomain":"greglujan"}

    I'll do you one better,

    Jerry Springer was on TV for how long?

    {"commentId":1094754,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"greglujan"}
    • 2 votes
    #1.10 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:02 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":1091313,"authorDomain":"brashmonkey"}

    I am so stunned that anyone can ever believe there is only one way to live life correctly and that "my way is that way." I know there are plenty who have strong opinions about how life should be lived, and I'm okay with that. But taking it to the point of blatant and willful oppression of another? I was under the impression that we were evolving beyond that and that we had learned from previous mistakes.

    I have been watching a documentary on the Spanish Inquisition. I hear in Coulter echoes of that same desire to purge the country of Judaism.

    DEUTSCH: How do you not see [how hateful, how anti-Semitic --]? You're an educated woman. How do you not see that?

    COULTER: That isn't hateful at all.

    DEUTSCH: But that's even a scarier thought.

    {"commentId":1091313,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"brashmonkey"}
    • 14 votes
    Reply#2 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:42 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1092414,"authorDomain":"a0ted"}

    She has all the charm of an impacted bowel.

    Explain the impact, please.

    {"commentId":1092414,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"a0ted"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:50 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1092418,"authorDomain":"a0ted"}

    I did not finish my sentence.

    Ann Coulter is loud, etc., but her comments were seeded four times at least in the NewsVine. That's the mother of all the impacts.

    {"commentId":1092418,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"a0ted"}
    • 2 votes
    #2.2 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:51 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":1091314,"authorDomain":"Catch22"}

    Coulter and the Jews

    Atrios and Andrew Sullivan agree that there's something fishy in Ann Coulter's desire to see Judaism wiped off the face of the earth so we can all be "perfected" by becoming Christians.

    This is an uncomfortable thing for Jewish people to think about, but isn't that actually a very banal baseline belief of all Christians and Muslims everywhere? Jews don't evangelize like this, and I don't think Hindus do either, but our world's great crusading faiths certainly do and converting everyone is . . . the whole point! This is one reason -- probably the reason -- that whatever the electoral politics of the matter, it's probably not a great idea to encourage politicians to "talk about faith" more. For America to work as an enterprise you need people with deeply held but mutually inconsistent religious beliefs to all work and live together peacefully. Rubbing everyone's noses in the precise implications of other people's beliefs (Christians think Jews shouldn't exist, Jews think Christians are worshipping a false messiah, Protestants think Catholics worship idols, etc.) isn't really helpful.

    {"commentId":1091314,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"Catch22"}
    • 19 votes
    Reply#3 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:42 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1091324,"authorDomain":"webquack"}

    Ann Coulter & Howard Stern are meant for each other.....

    {"commentId":1091324,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"webquack"}
    • 5 votes
    Reply#4 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:45 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1092274,"authorDomain":"dehehn"}

    Except Howard's controversial because of his fart noises and sex jokes, not his hate speech and killing Muslims jokes.

    {"commentId":1092274,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"dehehn"}
    • 8 votes
    #4.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:30 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1092955,"authorDomain":"softfacts"}

    I don't quite see the fart joke/hate speech connection either.

    {"commentId":1092955,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"softfacts"}
    • 1 vote
    #4.2 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:33 AM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":1091423,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

    What's really funny is watching lefties get the vapors over Coulter and righties get the vapors over Michael Moore. As polemicists they thrive on that stuff. I have no use for either.

    {"commentId":1091423,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
    • 9 votes
    Reply#5 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:10 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1091492,"authorDomain":"jlarosa"}

    Bill Harrison said --"What's really funny is watching lefties get the vapors over Coulter and righties get the vapors over Michael Moore. As polemicists they thrive on that stuff. I have no use for either."

    Good point Bill. Many people don't understand the roles that Moore and Coulter are playing, and give them the attention they so desperately desire. Kind of like the kid in your class who always acted up to get attention. What scares me are the people who actually agree with not only what these two spout, but love the way they present it.

    I must say however that, if this story is true, even Ann Coulter has outdone herself. Hitler must be grinning down at her. She is a pretty darn disgusting excuse for a human being.

    {"commentId":1091492,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"jlarosa"}
    • 4 votes
    #5.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:35 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1091504,"authorDomain":"wood-s"}

    Michael Moore does like to play the role of evil clown, but let's give him some credit. He does make cases for points of view, rather than simply engaging in attacks on individuals and groups. And rather than spew nasty names at them, he generally just sticks out a microphone and lets them make public jackasses of themselves.

    {"commentId":1091504,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"wood-s"}
    • 28 votes
    #5.2 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:41 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1091517,"authorDomain":"evilgenius"}

    What's really funny is watching lefties get the vapors over Coulter and righties get the vapors over Michael Moore. As polemicists they thrive on that stuff. I have no use for either.

    I'll second that!

    {"commentId":1091517,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"evilgenius"}
    • 2 votes
    #5.3 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:46 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1091696,"authorDomain":"brashmonkey"}

    I generally agree with you, Bill, and try to stay away from her articles. But this one for me is different. It's not about vapors when someone is deliberately calling for the oppression of a whole group of people. In this case, silence is consent. While I am fully in support of free speech and Coulter's or Moore's right to speak their mind, I also believe in a communities right to check outlandish ideals. Just like I appreciate Moore non-supporters pointing out when he is cherry-picking facts, Coulter non-supporters need to speak up loud and clear about this kind of hate-talk. Yeah, vapors aren't necessarily cause for logging comments, but this just isn't a case of vapors. Not for me anyway.

    {"commentId":1091696,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"brashmonkey"}
    • 8 votes
    #5.4 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:32 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1091702,"authorDomain":"Catch22"}

    Some people love to play the game of false equivalence.

    Hardly flawless, but for example Sicko is completely out of Coulter's league and better than all of her vicious publications put together.

    {"commentId":1091702,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"Catch22"}
    • 17 votes
    #5.5 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:35 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1091767,"authorDomain":"brashmonkey"}

    Catch, not sure what you mean by Some people love to play the game of false equivalence. Which comment was that in reference to? Mine or one of those above?

    {"commentId":1091767,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"brashmonkey"}
    • 1 vote
    #5.6 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:52 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1091788,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

    My guess is that he was making a reference to Bill mentioning Moore, because Moore is, you know, irrelevant in a discussion about Coulter.

    {"commentId":1091788,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
    • 9 votes
    #5.7 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:59 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1091808,"authorDomain":"Catch22"}

    Sorry for not being more precise. Dennis P. McCann is exactly right.

    {"commentId":1091808,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"Catch22"}
    • 11 votes
    #5.8 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:04 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1091941,"authorDomain":"iarnuocon"}

    yeah, and this happened exactly as represented: I watched it as it was broadcast.

    Coulter would sign up for the job of Grand Inquisitor in a New York minute, if the job were offered her.

    What I thought was funniest about the whole interview (since the anti-semitism wasn't funny, in the slightest) was when Deutsch asked her what her ideal America would look like-- what would America be like if everything she proposes came to pass. She came back with, "There'd be happy Republicans everywhere... everyone would have more money, we'd all be happy Christians..." It was as if she couldn't comprehend a world in which anyone wouldn't suddenly be converted to her point of view. The passing of legislation she wants, the calls for the forcible conversion of other faiths, and on and on, it all just sort of went over her head that anyone could possibly be resentful of these things, that her "order" could exist and yet not be compelling. There wasn't any acknowledgment of the reality of the situation, the work that would have to be done to reconcile the rest of the world to her view of America, etcetera, etcetera. Just this glassy-eyed fantasy that we'd all become happy little wealthy Republican robots.

    I guess that sums up Coulter best: glassy-eyed fantasies and cluelessness.

    {"commentId":1091941,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"iarnuocon"}
    • 12 votes
    #5.9 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:45 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1092041,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

    Hardly irrelevant at all. Both are cut from the same bolt of cloth. Sicko's a joke as are Moore's other "documentaries". The one truly funny movie he made was Canadian Bacon and Roger and Me too had its moments. It's all been downhill from there. When Coulter lived here in DC at the Kennedy-Warren she used to frequent my hangout. Anyone who smokes Carlton cigarettes has got to have a screw slightly loose. Those things are like dragging on a stick.

    {"commentId":1092041,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
    • 2 votes
    #5.10 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:24 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1092066,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

    Sure it's irrelevant. It's also common. happens all the time.

    If the thread is about Coulter, someone brings up Moore. If it's about O'Reilly, someone brings up Olbermann. I guess the idea must be that bringing up the nutjob from the other side takes some of the harsh spotlight off the current nutjob being discussed. Except that it, um, doesn't.

    I'll make a deal with you. Next time Moore says something idiotic, you seed it, and I'll promise not to bring up Coulter. Meanwhile, you leave Moore out of Coulter discussions.

    You know what I would really like? When one of these idiots says something insane like this, I'd like to see people from both sides just say, "Yeah, that's nuts, and she's (or he's) nuts. I don't know why I ever thought otherwise."

    {"commentId":1092066,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
    • 20 votes
    #5.11 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:33 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1092102,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

    You know, the funny thing is that when Coulter was living in NYC after 9/11 before moving to FL she was supposedly dating a Muslim investment banker. Maybe it was her third input proclivity, heh heh.

    {"commentId":1092102,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
    • 1 vote
    #5.12 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:52 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1092680,"authorDomain":"biggerthebetter"}

    ARGH! I wish I could erase my mind right now. Never, EVER do that to me again. You are off my Christmas card list.

    LOL

    {"commentId":1092680,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"biggerthebetter"}
      #5.13 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:00 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1095047,"authorDomain":"Catch22"}

      Sicko's a joke as are Moore's other "documentaries".

      What do you base your opinion on and why should anyone care what you think? What of Ann Coulters even begins to have similar merit.

      {"commentId":1095047,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"Catch22"}
      • 2 votes
      #5.14 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:09 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1091427,"authorDomain":"corvuscorax"}

      Where is the outrage? No sooner did Don Imus make an unacceptable comment than he was booted off of the air following a sturm and drang that monopolized headlines for weeks. Now, her brain addled by too much blonde hair dye, Ann Coulter has decreed that Jews need "perfecting." The transcript shows that she tried to deny it, but Donny Deutsch, to his credit, didn't let her off the hook. Time for CNBC and its owners to send Coulter packing, and apologize to all of us already perfect (or imperfect) Jews who are highly offended that she would even think she can get away with this sort of anti-Semitic crap. Enough already, Ann. Try perfecting your highly imperfect Christian self for starters.

      {"commentId":1091427,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"corvuscorax"}
      • 11 votes
      Reply#6 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:12 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091754,"authorDomain":"SuperUnspecial"}

      Ms. Coulter doesn't have a show from which to be fired, she just makes appearances.

      {"commentId":1091754,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"SuperUnspecial"}
      • 9 votes
      #6.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:49 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1091442,"authorDomain":"Catch22"}

      ""It would look like New York City during the Republican National Convention. In fact, that's what I think heaven is going to look like....People were happy. They're Christian. They're tolerant."

      Thats sort of like George Bush's approach to tolerance and bipartisanship. The problem is that we need to get rid of everyone who doesnt look, think, act and vote just like she does.

      {"commentId":1091442,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"Catch22"}
      • 15 votes
      Reply#7 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:16 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091776,"authorDomain":"a3dmofo"}

      I thought it funny that she was attempting to say how the mega-churches she speaks are amazingly tolerant, while they're bringing her into speak.

      {"commentId":1091776,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"a3dmofo"}
      • 5 votes
      #7.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:54 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091945,"authorDomain":"wood-s"}

      Well in a manner of speaking, it IS tolerant for religious groups that celebrate marriage, wholesome family values, and traditional roles for women, to welcome a 40-something woman who dresses like a hooker and has never been married. But we've known since the Reagan administration that the socially conservative Christian right admires people who TALK about the values the Christian right advocates, whether they live by those values or not. That's how the divorced Reagan, who was hardly on speaking terms with some of his children, could become a hero of family values, and the serial adulterer Newt Gingrich could be praised, without a trace of irony, of "being pro-family before pro-family was cool." Al Franken's comment was, "Was it cool to be pro-family before or after he got that b--- j-- from a colleague's wife?"

      {"commentId":1091945,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"wood-s"}
      • 8 votes
      #7.2 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:46 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1091471,"authorDomain":"wood-s"}

      Yep, that's Annie's heaven, all right -- all protesters and dissenters packed off to "free speech zones" miles away, out of sight and mind, and no Heinz ketchup on the tables.

      I agree that she's probably deliberately exaggerating and overstating her opinions for shock value, but I also believe that they ARE her true opinions, at heart. And the exquisite irony is that she sounds SO much like a militant Islamic fundamentalist. "Mohammed was the LAST prophet, haven't you heard? If you haven't caught up to the faith decreed by the last prophet, you're still lagging behind the times and need 'perfecting,' even if it takes a couple of passenger jets slammed into major buildings to get your attention." When Coulter explains why sneering at other religions is the Christian thing to do, she calls it "tough love." I'm sure Osama bin Laden felt exactly the same way when he sent the 19 hijackers on their mission. Rabidly self-righteous people are always too brittle to examine their own beliefs in an intellectually honest way, or tolerate challenges to them. She and Osama are twins separated at birth.

      {"commentId":1091471,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"wood-s"}
      • 12 votes
      Reply#8 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:27 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091647,"authorDomain":"chum"}

      Dennis, I appreciate you linking to a transcript instead of the video. I can't listen to it, but I can read this tripe. To remind me that we all have a long way to go.

      {"commentId":1091647,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"chum"}
      • 7 votes
      Reply#9 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:16 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091669,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

      heh. I didn't find the video.

      Mostly because I didn't look for it.

      {"commentId":1091669,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
      • 5 votes
      #9.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:23 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1091674,"authorDomain":"enn"}

      Coulter: Twisted theater, strange entertainment that feeds on and off the far right. Ideological porn for the neo-Nazi's of the west.

      {"commentId":1091674,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"enn"}
      • 5 votes
      Reply#10 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:25 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091687,"authorDomain":"JStranahan"}

      In other news...

      In an asymmetrical attack, Michael Medvid has camped on Michelle Malkin's front lawn demanding to see her HMO card,

      developing...

      {"commentId":1091687,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"JStranahan"}
      • 5 votes
      Reply#11 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:28 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091714,"authorDomain":"kharlowe"}

      If there's anything I hate, it's imperfect Jews!!!
      Why would anyone take this broad seriously?
      She's theater, bad theater, but theater never the less.
      She's like a comedian who hasn't yet perfected his routine. He sets up the joke, but fumbles the punch line with something so outrageous only 10% of the audience, the ones who are certifiable loonies, actually laugh. Then they come back the next night to get a few more yocks at her fumbling about for a thread of logic.
      It's not my kind of thing; she's just not that funny. However, if you like this kind of stuff, by all means enjoy.
      But, people, really now!! You can't believe this is real, can you?

      {"commentId":1091714,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"kharlowe"}
      • 5 votes
      Reply#12 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:38 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091735,"authorDomain":"greglujan"}

      COULTER: No. In fact, there was an entire Seinfeld episode about Elaine and her boyfriend dating because they wanted to be a mixed-race couple, so you're lying.

      I see,

      let's all just enjoy that for a little while.

      Seinfeld now is definitive proof that Donny Deutsch is lying. The old "seinfeld polygraph" and he fell for it.

      And actually she even managed to mischaracterize the Seinfeld episode. Elaine and the guy were dating, and they enjoyed that they were a mixed race couple, but didn't seek each other out specifically for the purpose of being one.

      You can't get a syndicated TV show that runs at least 4 episodes daily on at least two networks right, how is it you propose to speak for what Christians believe in terms of how we perceive Jews?

      and besides, those big box churches she speaks at don't have real christians in them anyway, everybody knows Catholicism is the one true religion. Don't believe me? I'll find a "Must see tv" reference to prove it!

      {"commentId":1091735,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"greglujan"}
      • 10 votes
      Reply#13 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:42 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091859,"authorDomain":"evilgenius"}

      It's the Mormons that got it right. I saw it on South Park!

      {"commentId":1091859,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"evilgenius"}
      • 1 vote
      #13.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:16 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091965,"authorDomain":"iarnuocon"}

      ♫ Dumb-dumb-dumb-dumb-dumb... ♫

      {"commentId":1091965,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"iarnuocon"}
      • 3 votes
      #13.2 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:52 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1091779,"authorDomain":"b-shaughnessy"}

      Someday, Coulter is going to have to develop her own idea to define herself, and not just in terms of what she hates.

      {"commentId":1091779,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"b-shaughnessy"}
      • 5 votes
      Reply#14 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:55 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091792,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

      No she won't.

      Her career ends with the Bush administration.

      {"commentId":1091792,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
      • 8 votes
      #14.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:00 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091830,"authorDomain":"Catch22"}

      No she won't.

      Her career ends with the Bush administration.

      In all liklihood you got that half-right. She will espouse hate and pander to those who eat it up whoever the President is. If she didnt, then Bush being elected should have been the end of her career, since it was largely started on attacking Clinton the subject of her first attack book of many books built on slurs to come.

      {"commentId":1091830,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"Catch22"}
      • 6 votes
      #14.2 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:09 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1092045,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

      LOL. If Hillary's elected her career is just starting.

      {"commentId":1092045,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
      • 1 vote
      #14.3 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:25 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1092332,"authorDomain":"wood-s"}

      Her career will end when she gets too old to play the femme fatale, and that day is not very far off, either. Until then, if a Democrat is in the White House she will screech for assassination or impeachment in no particular order of priority, and if a Republican is, she will call for the arrest on treason charges of anyone who questions with his policies. Questions, hell -- anyone who reports news that could suggest he is not all powerful. (Look how she reacted when the Columbia space shuttle crashed. How dare anyone imply that the U.S. is not all-powerful and invariably successful?)

      {"commentId":1092332,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"wood-s"}
      • 3 votes
      #14.4 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:09 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1091798,"authorDomain":"Aunk"}

      Hetep and Respect Good Spirits, did I hear someone say Ann Coulter-Taliban Christian?

      {"commentId":1091798,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"Aunk"}
      • 8 votes
      Reply#15 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:01 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091956,"authorDomain":"wood-s"}

      That's an excellent description.

      {"commentId":1091956,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"wood-s"}
      • 3 votes
      #15.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:48 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1091820,"authorDomain":"SuperUnspecial"}

      It's incredible how the mechanism works, she projects all of her fears and prejudices on everyone else and offers an exemption to those she likes.

      For instance this

      You walk past a mixed-race couple in New York, and it's like they have a chip on their shoulder. They're just waiting for somebody to say something, as if anybody would.

      As someone who was for eight years part of a mixed race couple, the times I anticipated comments or strange looks was traveling or living in, shall we say, the less sophisticated northeastern city's black neighborhoods, the seedier types of punk shows, and a few spots in the south and, of course the less enlightened rural NH neighborhoods. But New York City? I never anticipated any type of comment or strange look when I was with her whether it was the village, mid town, greenpoint, upper east side, 125th, washington heights, jackson heights, never ever in New York City. And I certainly was never disappointed about it. Who the hell craves intolerance directed at themselves or their loved ones?

      But I'm missing the point am I not? The point is to make fun of those about whom you intentionally know nothing while trying to make "your side" seem cool and "the other side" seem out of touch, humorless and lame. Suppose this wasn't her most successful interview.

      {"commentId":1091820,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"SuperUnspecial"}
      • 11 votes
      Reply#16 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:07 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1091857,"authorDomain":"Catch22"}

      You pick an excellent example whereby she takes the purely subjective and then asserts that is the basis for reality.

      "I give all of these speeches at megachurches across America, and the one thing that's really striking about it is how utterly, completely diverse they are, and completely un-self-consciously. You walk past a mixed-race couple in New York, and it's like they have a chip on their shoulder. They're just waiting for somebody to say something, as if anybody would."

      The interpretive framework is even more blatantly obvious when put together. Those she agrees with are assumed to have positive psychological features and those she doesnt negative. The only source of such conclusions is projection.

      Someone could have said exactly the opposite and been no less valid and perhaps more so. The following uses exactly the same words but merely changes the order of the two subjective descriptions.

      "I give all of these speeches at megachurches across America, and it's like they have a chip on their shoulder. They're just waiting for somebody to say something, as if anybody would. You walk past a mixed-race couple in New York, and the one thing that's really striking about it is how utterly, completely diverse they are, and completely un-self-consciously."

      {"commentId":1091857,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"Catch22"}
      • 10 votes
      #16.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:16 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1091916,"authorDomain":"biggerthebetter"}

      Okay, first of all, how is she even a Christian? What values of Christianity does she honestly manifest?

      Second of all, I'm sure she was just "taken out of context". Like Limbaugh.

      {"commentId":1091916,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"biggerthebetter"}
      • 6 votes
      Reply#17 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:35 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1092015,"authorDomain":"Zoilus"}

      This should be an inspiration to all you kids out there who want to be lawyers someday. That if you work hard, and study, you can pass the Bar Exam, no matter how stupid you are.

      {"commentId":1092015,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"Zoilus"}
      • 9 votes
      Reply#18 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:10 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1092048,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

      Yep, Cornell and the University of Michigan have obviously lowered their standards.

      {"commentId":1092048,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
      • 2 votes
      #18.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:26 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1092149,"authorDomain":"Zoilus"}

      Bill, keep this up and you'll be in my Will. •·¿•·

      {"commentId":1092149,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"Zoilus"}
      • 4 votes
      #18.2 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:14 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1092128,"authorDomain":"ydoc"}

      she is disgusting! I can't believe people still giver her a platform to spew her hatred and racist comments!

      {"commentId":1092128,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"ydoc"}
      • 4 votes
      Reply#19 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:01 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1092160,"authorDomain":"1fitspirit"}

      Someone muzzle the @!$%#, please.

      {"commentId":1092160,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"1fitspirit"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#20 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:19 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1092352,"authorDomain":"jtallon"}

      No... don't muzzle her. That would make her a martyr, at least in the eyes of Ann and her hardcore fans.

      Let her talk. Encourage her to talk. She does the most harm to her cause when she opens her mouth.

      Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing. Not only does it let you tell everyone what you believe, it gives your listeners a great chance to find out if you're a nutcase.

      {"commentId":1092352,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"jtallon"}
      • 6 votes
      #20.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:20 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1093103,"authorDomain":"laughman"}

      Let her talk. Encourage her to talk. She does the most harm to her cause when she opens her mouth.

      Absolutely right. Don't make a martyr of her. Give her as much rope as she wants...

      {"commentId":1093103,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"laughman"}
      • 5 votes
      #20.2 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:55 AM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1092262,"authorDomain":"agio"}

      Note to CNBC's Donny Deutsch: you don't have to have her on your show, ya know.

      {"commentId":1092262,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"agio"}
      • 6 votes
      Reply#21 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:16 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1092270,"authorDomain":"brendamayer"}

      My husband and I are both through with her. Even the people on Free Republic are disgusted. And I don't know what brand of Christianity she subscribes to, but it doesn't resemble anything I'm familiar with.

      {"commentId":1092270,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"brendamayer"}
      • 7 votes
      Reply#22 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:24 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1093339,"authorDomain":"a0ted"}

      Brenda,

      I have a humble political library. I don't have any book from Ann Coulter. She is too loud like the Cajun man married to M. Matalin. All have the same pattern by the cookie cutter.

      {"commentId":1093339,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"a0ted"}
      • 2 votes
      #22.1 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:13 AM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1092309,"authorDomain":"richardcfriedman"}

      As an atheist, I like to think my "religious" views are correct and that anybody who disagrees with me is not as wise. So, naturally, I think Coulter is seriously mistaken, if not downright goofy, in thinking her religion is better than anyone else's. Nevertheless, I couldn't care less whether anyone else agrees with me. As far as I am concerned, others are free to believe whatever claptrap they want, so long as they leave me be and don't try to impose their views on the rest of us. That's what the 1st Amendment is all about.

      {"commentId":1092309,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"richardcfriedman"}
      • 5 votes
      Reply#23 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:53 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1092310,"authorDomain":"tma"}

      Uhhmm, wasn't Jesus Jewish? Bit of a paradox Anne. And note to self: quoting "Seinfeld" (also Jewish) as a real life argument AND to accuse someone of "lying", is well, just not a good idea.

      {"commentId":1092310,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"tma"}
      • 4 votes
      Reply#24 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:53 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1092394,"authorDomain":"biggerthebetter"}

      Obviously Ann cannot discern between real life and fantasy (t.v.). I'd say that pretty much kills her credibility in all other matters...

      {"commentId":1092394,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"biggerthebetter"}
      • 4 votes
      #24.1 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:38 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1093682,"authorDomain":"tma"}

      I wonder if Coulter dances like Elaine.

      {"commentId":1093682,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"tma"}
      • 1 vote
      #24.2 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:11 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1094919,"authorDomain":"melonhead"}

      She's built like Kramer.

      {"commentId":1094919,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"melonhead"}
      • 2 votes
      #24.3 - Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:19 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1092324,"authorDomain":"corvuscorax"}

      It's high time that the "legitimate" media stop legitimizing lunatic bigots like Ann Coulter. No one's going to accuse people of being sexist or anti-blonde if they just ignore her. The media might have a responsibility to present all views fairly--fair enough--but no one has an obligation to put bigots like Coulter on the air as if they had something of value to contribute to society. She doesn't, and enriching her merely because she can turn a phrase and get attention is no better than enriching any other racist bigot who spews venemous diatribes all over the airwaves. I still think the media has a responsibility here, particularly after the Imus fiasco. It simply can't all be about catharis and back to usual, since it's "only" Jews that Coulter offended this time. Shut her up, get her off, and let's get some people who have legitimate and responsible opinions on the air, even if I do disagree with them.

      {"commentId":1092324,"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678","authorDomain":"corvuscorax"}
      • 6 votes
      Reply#25 - Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:05 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1092400,"authorDomain":"EddieStarr"}
      EddieStarrDeleted
      Jump to discussion page: 1 2
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"160767","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"160767","contentId":"1018678"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking