

Rumsfeld , Acrylic on canvas. © 2006, Dennis P. McCann, Paper Dragon Studios®
In the week leading up to the Congressional election, I found myself to be overly energetic. Perhaps it was the fact that I had already voted by absentee ballot, and all I could do was wait. Perhaps it was the anticipation of taking the first step toward ending our national nightmare. Perhaps it was just the Turkish coffee.
In oder to use this energy in a productive way, I turned to an old exercise that I have been doing since I was a teenager - one day paintings.
The one day concept has been very beneficial for me. I find that I do some of my best work when I don't spend too much time thinking about it, and instead work from instinct. Over the years I have done many one day paintings, and they are among my favorites, and quite often get the best reviews, or sell for higher amounts.
The concept is all-inclusive; they are not just painted in one day. I stretch the canvas, prime it, sketch it, and then paint it. All in one day. All in one session, without a break.
Because the election, and all of it's underlying issues, was on my mind, I decided to paint what I saw as the most important issue, and the cause of all the problems - the neocons. The most effective way was a series of portraits, with only the color and pne other element as commentary.
And so, I give you the first in the One Day Paintings: Neocon Series.
Rumsfeld. Acrylic on Canvas, 5- x 70 cm, 2 Nov. 2006.
Thanks for posting this Dennis, Monet would be proud, the one day, one hour, painting. Wonder how this painting would look today.
Wonderful work.
Forest
I like it, I think you captured his general look.
I'm curious about your method. Would you say you had any trouble scanning the acrylic image? Do you have your own scanner?
In the past I've wondered about how well scanning acrylic art works as far as color transfer goes.
Well done --- unfortunately I am unwilling to bid on a Rumsfeld.
But very talented
It should get hung in the House of Shame.
Let me clarify, the shame belongs to Feldy. In terms of art, it should go in the Hall of Honor.
innovative, creative idea...i like it
lol you have too much time on your hands...i envy you...i've always had the dream of just being able to write for a living....
I like it quite a bit, except I have one problem. The "neo" in "neocon" is there for a reason. Rumsfeld (and for that matter, Rice and especially Cheney) aren't, in my estimation, neocons.
The prefix neo- refers to two ways in which neoconservatism was new. First, many of the movement's founders, originally liberals, Democrats or from socialist backgrounds, were new to conservatism. Also, neoconservatism was a comparatively recent strain of conservative socio-political thought. It derived from a variety of intellectual roots in the decades following World War II, including literary criticism and the social sciences.
Dennis- excellent painting of a neocon monster. Those brainwashed by the racist, lying, holocaust-denying, corporate mainstream media might see a determined man who firmly believes in what he has been doing but has ultimately been brought down.
However those who take seriously the demographic data of top US medical epidemiologists and biometricians, UN demographers and UNICEF will realize that this man (together with Bush, Cheney, Dr Rice (Dr Death, Wicked Witch of the West), Blair, Racist White Australia's Howard and the New War Criminals running Germany, Holland, Japan and like countries of the US Alliance) is complicit in post-invasion deaths in Occupied Iraq and Occupied Afghanistan totalling 0.9 million and 2.1 million, respectively, due to gross violation of the Geneva Conventions - 3.0 million post-invasion excess deaths or one thousand (1,000) times the number of people murdered on 9/11 (see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/10528/42/ ).
Seen in the light of horrendous mass paedocidal reality (rather than that of mainstream media holocaust-denial) - 1.6 million under-5 infant deaths in Iraq (population 28 million) since America started bombing, sanctions and continuous killing in 1990 as compared to 1.5 million Jewsih children murdered by the Nazis in WW2 out of a global Jewish population of 15 million - the painting has powerful thematic elements relating to war and evil.
This indeed a powerful portrait of a monster - but a monster who is supported by the Racist Religious Right Republican Bush-ites or roughly half of the voting population of the United States.
Thus: blue/sky, yellow/desert, Iraq, Middle East, black/oil, ash; smashed glass/end of career, destruction, weapon image, guns, violence, wanton destruction; one eye open & one eye closed/deception, dishonesty, spin, fanaticism, certitude, glare, hatred, bigotry, racism; yellow teeth/dog teeth, savagery, mad dog, rabid dog, violence, implacable evil.
I think this is a very powerful image. I'm not very political and haven't really followed the war closely. This means I don't really have a well formed personal opinion of Donald Rumsfeld.
I don't think I like him, but after seeing this painting I'm sure I don't. He looks so angry. The sort of anger you can't reason with. He looks like he's accusing me of something. It's a little bit scary and unsettling.
I think the colours add to my feeling of repulsion. The unhealthy grey, the sickly orange. The red lines make him look like he's about to burst a blood vessel.
The broken glass makes me think that either people have thrown stuff at him because they hate him and he's protected behind glass, or he's shouting so loud that he's cracked some glass.
"As you know, you go to
warpaint with theArmyeasel you have. They're not theArmyeasel you might want or wish to have at a later time." Rummy.
Where are my manners... Great Job!
I think you've captured the essence of the man quite well, Dennis: jaundiced, angry and shattered! Perhaps this is coloured by my opinion of the man, but I expect he's in the process of telling another lie...
Dennis ,
what/who is your next subject?
Does Cheney hold a shotgun?
When I first saw the painting you presented above I 1) Immediately knew you had done it. 2) Thought Wow that piece feels like I feel inside when I think about D. R.. 3) It was as though I had spoken about it out loud without having to utter a word. 4)Fantastic! 5) I'd be willing to bet that this series will be huge, not in size but in interest. In years to come I think we will see them quite a lot.
Dennis, I have seen your work and to see it again even without knowing it was yours I would be able to tell you had done it. Its just that certain something that makes it like a fingerprint or handwriting, it could only be yours. I am very fond of your work and the thing that draws me the most is many times even if I am less than fond of the subject, often I like the work. In my experience, and opinion, when I see a subject I dislike I often tend to dislike the piece. This is not true of your pieces. Even when I look at the subjects I do not like I still am drawn to the work itself. The only word I can use to explain the feeling is " aggreement". I think it is a mental thing and not so much a visual thing.
That's a very good painting and although I've come to this group late (so I don't know if you sold it or not), I would be willing to buy it.
our fragile fractured existance. those are the words that come to mind when i saw your painting. that's how i feel sometimes. like you're looking at the world through a broken pair of glasses. what you see is still a whole but formed from shattered parts. i think the color organization lends a sense of calamity to the piece—great discords.
Hi, Dennis,
Read about your show in Ankara coming up -- congrats -- and so decided to go back to the first painting in series as well as the whole set to get the overall view.
Some commenters see broken glass in your painting but I see the explosion or detonation of bombs -- the 'shock and awe' that so many in the Defense Dept. are so fond of. Is that what you intended by the jagged shard-like images?
I am not able to ID any hidden shapes in the images -- I suspect there may be outline of maps of Iraqi regions or cities but I don't recognize them. Can you give out free answers or hints?
You should really consider selling prints rather than the originals to these paintings. You would make far more than selling the original, and I bet lots of Viners would love to hang a print of yours at home and tell about the painter and subject to anyone who visits!
You're just a painting demon!!!
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |