Visit Dennis P. McCann's column >>

DENNIS P. MCCANNHome Page

Türkiye'deki Amerikalı Sanatçı
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 70; Links Seeded: 1290
Member Since: 3/2006

Neocon Series: Rumsfeld. A One Day Painting.

Rumsfeld , Acrylic on canvas. © 2006, Dennis P. McCann, Paper Dragon Studios®

advertisement

First in a Series

In the week leading up to the Congressional election, I found myself to be overly energetic. Perhaps it was the fact that I had already voted by absentee ballot, and all I could do was wait. Perhaps it was the anticipation of taking the first step toward ending our national nightmare. Perhaps it was just the Turkish coffee.

In oder to use this energy in a productive way, I turned to an old exercise that I have been doing since I was a teenager - one day paintings.

The one day concept has been very beneficial for me. I find that I do some of my best work when I don't spend too much time thinking about it, and instead work from instinct. Over the years I have done many one day paintings, and they are among my favorites, and quite often get the best reviews, or sell for higher amounts.

The concept is all-inclusive; they are not just painted in one day. I stretch the canvas, prime it, sketch it, and then paint it. All in one day. All in one session, without a break.

Because the election, and all of it's underlying issues, was on my mind, I decided to paint what I saw as the most important issue, and the cause of all the problems - the neocons. The most effective way was a series of portraits, with only the color and pne other element as commentary.

And so, I give you the first in the One Day Paintings: Neocon Series.

Rumsfeld. Acrylic on Canvas, 5- x 70 cm, 2 Nov. 2006.

  • 42 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
89
9.9
3.8
{"commentId":389009,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

This is the first painting featured on ARTgallery, a Newsvine group dedicated to showcasing the artwork of Viners.

It was previewed in ARTguild, a private group/workshop for artists on Newsvine. I would like to thank the members for there encouragement and comments.

{"commentId":389009,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:50 PM EST
{"commentId":1981403,"authorDomain":"caroleroach"}

Wonderful work. Thank you for sharing your creativity.

{"commentId":1981403,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"caroleroach"}
  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:43 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":389072,"authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}

Thanks for posting this Dennis, Monet would be proud, the one day, one hour, painting. Wonder how this painting would look today.

Wonderful work.

Forest

{"commentId":389072,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:16 PM EST
{"commentId":389089,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

Thanks, Forest. Not one hour, though. I spent, I guess, about 18 hours on this.

As for Monet... I think his paintings would look the same if he were doing them today, though the subjects would probably be different.

{"commentId":389089,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:28 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":389075,"authorDomain":"lucidweyland"}

I like it, I think you captured his general look.

I'm curious about your method. Would you say you had any trouble scanning the acrylic image? Do you have your own scanner?

In the past I've wondered about how well scanning acrylic art works as far as color transfer goes.

{"commentId":389075,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"lucidweyland"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:19 PM EST
{"commentId":389094,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

I think you captured his general look.

Angry as hell?

I'm curious about your method. Would you say you had any trouble scanning the acrylic image? Do you have your own scanner?

I wish I had a scanner. No, this is a photo taken with a cheap Kodak digital camera. Notice the shiny area in the lower left corner.

I've seen many scans of acrylic paintings. They usually work well.

{"commentId":389094,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:31 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":389113,"authorDomain":"chill888"}

Well done --- unfortunately I am unwilling to bid on a Rumsfeld.

But very talented

{"commentId":389113,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"chill888"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#4 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:41 PM EST
{"commentId":389200,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

Ha ha ha. You don't want it, chill? Hell, I don't want it either!

Eh, I'll pawn it off on a collector.

{"commentId":389200,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 6 votes
#4.1 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:17 PM EST
{"commentId":389980,"authorDomain":"vas"}

It should get hung in the House of Shame.

{"commentId":389980,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"vas"}
  • 4 votes
#4.2 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:48 PM EST
{"commentId":389986,"authorDomain":"vas"}

Let me clarify, the shame belongs to Feldy. In terms of art, it should go in the Hall of Honor.

{"commentId":389986,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"vas"}
  • 3 votes
#4.3 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:51 PM EST
{"commentId":390345,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

It should get hung in the House of Shame.

1600 Pennsylvania Ave.?

{"commentId":390345,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 2 votes
#4.4 - Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:48 AM EST
Reply
{"commentId":389137,"authorDomain":"calcg88"}

innovative, creative idea...i like it

{"commentId":389137,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"calcg88"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#5 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:51 PM EST
{"commentId":389375,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

Thanks. I've also done Dick Cheney and Condolleezza Rice, so far. I'll publish those in upcoming articles. If I can find good pictures, I also do Bush and Rove.

{"commentId":389375,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 3 votes
#5.1 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:42 PM EST
{"commentId":389708,"authorDomain":"calcg88"}

lol you have too much time on your hands...i envy you...i've always had the dream of just being able to write for a living....

{"commentId":389708,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"calcg88"}
  • 2 votes
#5.2 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 6:31 PM EST
{"commentId":389717,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

I wish I had too much time. Nah, I'm an artist. It's what I do.

{"commentId":389717,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 2 votes
#5.3 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 6:43 PM EST
{"commentId":391318,"authorDomain":"ignoblus"}

I like it quite a bit, except I have one problem. The "neo" in "neocon" is there for a reason. Rumsfeld (and for that matter, Rice and especially Cheney) aren't, in my estimation, neocons.

The prefix neo- refers to two ways in which neoconservatism was new. First, many of the movement's founders, originally liberals, Democrats or from socialist backgrounds, were new to conservatism. Also, neoconservatism was a comparatively recent strain of conservative socio-political thought. It derived from a variety of intellectual roots in the decades following World War II, including literary criticism and the social sciences.

{"commentId":391318,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"ignoblus"}
  • 2 votes
#5.4 - Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:01 PM EST
{"commentId":391327,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

I suppose that would depend on your definition. For the most part, I agree with you. That is, though, the accepted term for these people, and probably the one they will carry with them through history.

My belief is they are fascists.

{"commentId":391327,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 3 votes
#5.5 - Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:06 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":389402,"authorDomain":"gpolya"}

Dennis- excellent painting of a neocon monster. Those brainwashed by the racist, lying, holocaust-denying, corporate mainstream media might see a determined man who firmly believes in what he has been doing but has ultimately been brought down.

However those who take seriously the demographic data of top US medical epidemiologists and biometricians, UN demographers and UNICEF will realize that this man (together with Bush, Cheney, Dr Rice (Dr Death, Wicked Witch of the West), Blair, Racist White Australia's Howard and the New War Criminals running Germany, Holland, Japan and like countries of the US Alliance) is complicit in post-invasion deaths in Occupied Iraq and Occupied Afghanistan totalling 0.9 million and 2.1 million, respectively, due to gross violation of the Geneva Conventions - 3.0 million post-invasion excess deaths or one thousand (1,000) times the number of people murdered on 9/11 (see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/10528/42/ ).

Seen in the light of horrendous mass paedocidal reality (rather than that of mainstream media holocaust-denial) - 1.6 million under-5 infant deaths in Iraq (population 28 million) since America started bombing, sanctions and continuous killing in 1990 as compared to 1.5 million Jewsih children murdered by the Nazis in WW2 out of a global Jewish population of 15 million - the painting has powerful thematic elements relating to war and evil.

This indeed a powerful portrait of a monster - but a monster who is supported by the Racist Religious Right Republican Bush-ites or roughly half of the voting population of the United States.

Thus: blue/sky, yellow/desert, Iraq, Middle East, black/oil, ash; smashed glass/end of career, destruction, weapon image, guns, violence, wanton destruction; one eye open & one eye closed/deception, dishonesty, spin, fanaticism, certitude, glare, hatred, bigotry, racism; yellow teeth/dog teeth, savagery, mad dog, rabid dog, violence, implacable evil.

{"commentId":389402,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"gpolya"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#6 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:55 PM EST
{"commentId":389431,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

Gideon, the next exhibit I have, you're writing the review.

Thanks for noticing the symbolism in the colors. I chose those colors for reasons very close to what you have mentioned. The yellow ochre in the face just seemed obvious to me. It suggested jaundice; something rotting, while at the same time had a military feeling. The red, used as a midtone, for blood. As the Secretary of Defense, e.g., Minister of War, this man deals in blood. The blood of other people - innocent people.

Gray - death. Colorless. Black/white. Unbending.

The composition - the way the areas of color interlock, but never blend - camouflage. Alluding to camouflage in a military sense, and also the camouflage of lies told to us by the Neocons. Hide the truth. Dishonesty.

The broken glass - I thought of it as destruction - again related to war, as this was painted on Nov. 2 - six days before he was relieved from his post. In fact, when I broke the story of his "resignation" on Newsvine, I was looking at the painting, then the screen, back to the painting - and it seemed kind of... eerie.

{"commentId":389431,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 5 votes
#6.1 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:11 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":389508,"authorDomain":"richardg"}

I think this is a very powerful image. I'm not very political and haven't really followed the war closely. This means I don't really have a well formed personal opinion of Donald Rumsfeld.

I don't think I like him, but after seeing this painting I'm sure I don't. He looks so angry. The sort of anger you can't reason with. He looks like he's accusing me of something. It's a little bit scary and unsettling.

I think the colours add to my feeling of repulsion. The unhealthy grey, the sickly orange. The red lines make him look like he's about to burst a blood vessel.

The broken glass makes me think that either people have thrown stuff at him because they hate him and he's protected behind glass, or he's shouting so loud that he's cracked some glass.

{"commentId":389508,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"richardg"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#7 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:40 PM EST
{"commentId":389524,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

Thanks, Richard.

I like your comment, especially in light of the fact that you don't know much about Rumsfeld. It seems to me that you got it anyway. You have a good understanding of who he is, or at least how I see him.

Come to think of it, it seems you do know enough about him - now. You just described him pretty well.

{"commentId":389524,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 4 votes
#7.1 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:46 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":389890,"authorDomain":"jimdent"}

"As you know, you go to war paint with the Army easel you have. They're not the Army easel you might want or wish to have at a later time." Rummy.

{"commentId":389890,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"jimdent"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#8 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:33 PM EST
{"commentId":389897,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

Hahahahahaha!!! Great.

{"commentId":389897,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 5 votes
#8.1 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:36 PM EST
{"commentId":389901,"authorDomain":"jimdent"}

Where are my manners... Great Job!

{"commentId":389901,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"jimdent"}
  • 5 votes
#8.2 - Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:41 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":390299,"authorDomain":"Sarcophilus"}

I think you've captured the essence of the man quite well, Dennis: jaundiced, angry and shattered! Perhaps this is coloured by my opinion of the man, but I expect he's in the process of telling another lie...

{"commentId":390299,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"Sarcophilus"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#9 - Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:17 AM EST
{"commentId":390344,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

Thanks, Sarcophilus.

{"commentId":390344,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 2 votes
#9.1 - Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:47 AM EST
Reply
{"commentId":391339,"authorDomain":"chill888"}

Dennis ,

what/who is your next subject?

{"commentId":391339,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"chill888"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#10 - Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:11 PM EST
{"commentId":391355,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

I've already done Cheney and Rice. I'll post those soon.

I'm looking for suitable pictures of Bush and Rove - its not like I can just invite them over for lunch - and though I may do more for the Neocon series later on, I'm sure I will tire of it after those.

I'm also working on a few other projects right now. Some paintings of things I've seen in Turkey, for example.

{"commentId":391355,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 3 votes
#10.1 - Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:17 PM EST
{"commentId":391458,"authorDomain":"vas"}

Does Cheney hold a shotgun?

{"commentId":391458,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"vas"}
  • 3 votes
#10.2 - Tue Nov 21, 2006 6:23 PM EST
{"commentId":392309,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

Only if he's hunting lame duck.

{"commentId":392309,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 3 votes
#10.3 - Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:29 AM EST
Reply
{"commentId":392296,"authorDomain":"warners"}

When I first saw the painting you presented above I 1) Immediately knew you had done it. 2) Thought Wow that piece feels like I feel inside when I think about D. R.. 3) It was as though I had spoken about it out loud without having to utter a word. 4)Fantastic! 5) I'd be willing to bet that this series will be huge, not in size but in interest. In years to come I think we will see them quite a lot.

{"commentId":392296,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"warners"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#11 - Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:11 AM EST
{"commentId":392308,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

Thanks, Robinmarie.

How did you know I had done it? I mean, other than the obvious - that my name is on it.

As for your fifth point... These kind of paintings usually generate very little interest, until much later. Protest art, or social commentary art, is everywhere, so it all blends together and gets lost in the shuffle. Later, though, the people who are interested in your work run across it, and it takes on a new meaning. People add it into the mix of your other art, trying to get an idea how this opinion fits in with that opinion.

Right now Rumsfeld is in the news; he's relevant. The real test is how this piece will be viewed years from now.

Long ago, I did a piece entitled "Vote Republican." It sat there for years, and collected dust. But last year, I received a call from a collector who showed a lot of interest - 30 years after I painted it. You just never know.

{"commentId":392308,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 2 votes
#11.1 - Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:25 AM EST
{"commentId":392328,"authorDomain":"warners"}

Dennis, I have seen your work and to see it again even without knowing it was yours I would be able to tell you had done it. Its just that certain something that makes it like a fingerprint or handwriting, it could only be yours. I am very fond of your work and the thing that draws me the most is many times even if I am less than fond of the subject, often I like the work. In my experience, and opinion, when I see a subject I dislike I often tend to dislike the piece. This is not true of your pieces. Even when I look at the subjects I do not like I still am drawn to the work itself. The only word I can use to explain the feeling is " aggreement". I think it is a mental thing and not so much a visual thing.

{"commentId":392328,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"warners"}
  • 2 votes
#11.2 - Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:06 AM EST
Reply
{"commentId":392760,"authorDomain":"gregplancich"}

That's a very good painting and although I've come to this group late (so I don't know if you sold it or not), I would be willing to buy it.

{"commentId":392760,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"gregplancich"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#12 - Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:32 AM EST
{"commentId":392766,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

Thanks, Greg. No, I just published this two days ago. Email me if you're interested.

{"commentId":392766,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 1 vote
#12.1 - Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:34 AM EST
Reply
{"commentId":392923,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

The second painting in the series has been published.
Cheney.

{"commentId":392923,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#13 - Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:54 PM EST
{"commentId":395475,"authorDomain":"iboga"}

our fragile fractured existance. those are the words that come to mind when i saw your painting. that's how i feel sometimes. like you're looking at the world through a broken pair of glasses. what you see is still a whole but formed from shattered parts. i think the color organization lends a sense of calamity to the piece—great discords.

{"commentId":395475,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"iboga"}
    Reply#14 - Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:03 AM EST
    {"commentId":395476,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

    Thanks, Austin.

    {"commentId":395476,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
      #14.1 - Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:07 AM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":395518,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

      The third painting in the series can be found here:

      Rice.

      {"commentId":395518,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
        Reply#15 - Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:27 AM EST
        {"commentId":1968296,"authorDomain":"MinnieApolis"}

        Hi, Dennis,
        Read about your show in Ankara coming up -- congrats -- and so decided to go back to the first painting in series as well as the whole set to get the overall view.
        Some commenters see broken glass in your painting but I see the explosion or detonation of bombs -- the 'shock and awe' that so many in the Defense Dept. are so fond of. Is that what you intended by the jagged shard-like images?
        I am not able to ID any hidden shapes in the images -- I suspect there may be outline of maps of Iraqi regions or cities but I don't recognize them. Can you give out free answers or hints?
        You should really consider selling prints rather than the originals to these paintings. You would make far more than selling the original, and I bet lots of Viners would love to hang a print of yours at home and tell about the painter and subject to anyone who visits!

        {"commentId":1968296,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"MinnieApolis"}
        • 2 votes
        Reply#16 - Sat Jun 14, 2008 4:52 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1968482,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

        Read about your show in Ankara coming up -- congrats -- and so decided to go back to the first painting in series as well as the whole set to get the overall view.

        Thanks. So you're a masochist, I take it?

        Some commenters see broken glass in your painting but I see the explosion or detonation of bombs -- the 'shock and awe' that so many in the Defense Dept. are so fond of. Is that what you intended by the jagged shard-like images?

        Yeah. The broken glass is obvious, but of course there's more to it than that. Rumsfeld's job came down to breaking the middle east... so the 'breaking glass' is symbolic of destruction.. of Iraq, of Peace, of trust in our government. There's more about that in comment 6.1.

        I suspect there may be outline of maps of Iraqi regions or cities but I don't recognize them. Can you give out free answers or hints?

        No, no hidden shapes...not in this one ;-)

        I've thought about prints. I just haven't getten around to doing anything about it. Hell, I'm still working on the series. It's hanging in a gallery right now, and after I hung it last weekend I came home and started another painting. Finished that, and I'm most of the way through yet another one!

        {"commentId":1968482,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
        • 4 votes
        #16.1 - Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:27 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1970469,"authorDomain":"MinnieApolis"}

        You're just a painting demon!!!

        {"commentId":1970469,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"MinnieApolis"}
        • 1 vote
        #16.2 - Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:35 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1971582,"authorDomain":"paperdragon"}

        Especially when I'm painting these demons...

        {"commentId":1971582,"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896","authorDomain":"paperdragon"}
        • 1 vote
        #16.3 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:18 AM EDT
        Reply
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"56000","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"56000","contentId":"449896"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking